But with Senator Barack Obama essentially sealing the Democratic nomination this week, I wanted to re-share my piece from Perception is Reality just a few weeks ago:
Raj Sharan
Editor, Perception Publications
How Branding Could Land a Nomination
by Raj Sharan
Week after week, this newsletter discusses varying ways to incorporate different aspects of branding in an effort to help you differentiate your business from the competition. Currently, there is no competition being contested as fiercely as the race for the Democratic Presidential nomination between Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama.
Looking back approximately two years, Senator Clinton was considered by a majority of experts as the presumptive Democratic nominee for the Presidential election in 2008. Between that time and today, Senator Clinton has found a more than able opponent in Senator Obama.
Historically in politics, this level of swing can be attributed to some type of meltdown or disaster on the part of the favorite - but in this instance, Senator Clinton has run what appears to be a strong campaign without any major red flags popping up to cause this dramatic turn of events. So what could have caused this gradual and surprising turn from Senator Clinton to Senator Obama? I would like to propose the possibility that far-stronger branding on the part of the Obama campaign may have contributed to his rise.
One glance at the candidates’ campaign websites shows the drastic difference in verbal and visual branding between the two competitors. The header of Senator Clinton’s website reads the same as most all of her campaign signs, t-shirts, buttons, etc. Her logo simply reads, “Hillary for President” with a small American flag banner below. Looking through her site for various graphics, her online store for various items and her webpages for various content - there is no consistent brand or tagline to help distinguish herself.
Verbally, through her campaign speeches and message, Senator Clinton has attempted to establish herself as the more seasoned candidate with the necessary experience that will lead to a stronger Presidency than Senator Obama. This message, however, is not conveyed in any way throughout Senator Clinton’s visual brand. Verbally, while Senator Clinton often refers to her time as First Lady in the White House being a major plus, she has failed to find a way to brand that message in her platform in a manner as strongly as Senator Obama has branded his message.
To the contrary, Senator Obama’s brand is well represented and distinguished. Attempting to appeal to Americans frustrated with various situations that have contributed to President Bush’s low approval ratings, Senator Obama’s entire campaign has been branded with the image of change. Not only does this message of change resonate with voters who are driven by their desire for change, but it also represents Senator Obama’s youth, energy and the direction in which he plans to lead the nation.
This superior branding helps to differentiate Senator Obama from Senator Clinton - who through her connection to her husband, former President Bill Clinton, has been front-and-center in the world of politics over the past 15-plus years - and could also serve Obama well to differentiate himself from Senator John McCain should he advance. Also a well-known politician with whom voters have been familiar for years, McCain’s potential presidency is projected by many political experts to share some similarity with that of President Bush. Should these potential similarities be of the variety that are contributing to our current president’s difficulties with popularity, we could have yet another example of the potential for Senator Obama’s brand to distinguish him - one that could land him in the White House.
The stellar implementation of Senator Obama’s visual and verbal brand as a leader of change in many respects is clearly helping him form a strong connection with voters. For a voter looking for some type of change in the country, this visual imagery has a powerful effect. Nearly everywhere you see Senator Obama; you see his moniker of change. During his speeches, campaign signs reading “Change We Can Believe In” and “Stand for Change” are impossible to miss. There is even a sign referencing change positioned on the front of the podiums from which he speaks. This message is plastered throughout his website and on nearly every single campaign material bearing Senator Obama’s name. Wherever you see Senator Obama, you see the word change.
Obama’s visual image is enhanced through the verbal branding of his message as well. He has woven the message of change into nearly every speech, interview or debate in which he has participated. Senator Obama may speak on the change of a current policy, political process, or an attribute of the very nature of American society - no matter the topic; Senator Obama has stayed consistent with his brand of change. This branding has become so strong, and resonated so greatly with his supporters, his rallies and speeches are frequently dominated by chants of, “Yes we can!” in response to the posed question, “Can we change?”
There can be many reasons why a voter chooses to support one candidate over another. It may be due to past experiences, a platform stance or even personality. However, with two candidates squaring off with similar platforms, and campaign occurrences lacking any blockbuster mistakes which directly contribute to their political demise, one must factor in branding as a powerful distinguishing force in this election.
What does this mean for you and your business? It’s vital to create a strong brand that is implemented correctly both visually and verbally - to differentiate yourself from your competition. While Senator Obama and Senator Clinton are only competing with each other, your business is likely competing with hundreds - even thousands. To garner the attention of customers away from your competitors, you must stand out. If you have yet to take the time to properly brand your business, you may be asking yourself if your company can properly brand itself to change from the rest of the crowd. The answer to that question is yes you can!